Skip to content

Monthly Archives: August 2008

Sarah Palin – Most Searched Keyword on Google!

Last week I asked folks to predict who would be the VP choices, and surprisingly, no one picked the ultimate winners!  I am most impressed with Strong Moderate who was the only person to predict Sarah Palin.  Nice job, I don’t think too many people had her on the short list last week. 

While I think McCain’s pick was less “safe” than Obama’s, I think it will ultimately hurt him.  Just as Dan Quayle became an albatross around Sr. Bush’s neck, I think Palin will also come up short for McCain.  Why?  One reason, she has no experience.  She is even fresher than Obama, and that is startling in itself.  Reading her bio on Wikipedia proves her to be a very interesting individual, however I am not sure that her qualifications (2nd in 1984 Miss Alaska competition) are going to energize the electorate. 

I think the most interesting line in her bio is, “On September 11, 2007, the Palins’ then eighteen-year-old son Track, eldest of five, joined the Army. He now serves in an infantry brigade and will be deployed to Iraq on September 11, 2008″  That sure is a lot of 9/11’s.  Coincidence?  Let’s see what EuroYank has to say…

What do you think?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Print
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Hillary Clinton Joins the Bull Moose Party?

Last week we had a spirited discussion about the Fairness Doctrine, and out of that discussion, a number of readers commented on how the current status quo in Washington results in little progress. The fierce partisanship between the Republicans and Democrats seems to be resulting in more grid-lock and greater vilification of each other, rather than the goal of finding common ground in the making of public policy.

I have been a disgruntled Independent since I was 18 and voted for Ronald Reagan many years ago. In fact, Ronnie was the only Democrat or Republican that I have ever voted for President. I am a strong believer in the need to create a strong third party within the US. The current two-party system creates an environment that is a quite a paradox. As the two party’s policies actually move closer together, the division and ranker in both the elected and the electorate are actually increasing. Strange days indeed, quite peculiar Mama.

I had high hopes for the Reform Party, however Ross Perot ultimately proved he was a bit crazy, and abandoned the party once it was not all about him. I would have liked to have seen him provide support even after he was no longer a candidate. All of the other third parties sit too far outside the common mainstream “silent majority” to really have a chance. Candidates like Ralph Nader, Pat Buchanan, Michael Anthony Peroutka, and Cynthia Ann McKinney have not really been able to draw much, if any, attention.

In order for a third party to gain a foothold it must have a nationally known political figure step up to the challenge. In 1912, that was Teddy Roosevelt, who had lost the Republican nomination, and created the Bull Moose Party. Later in 1980, John Anderson ran against Carter and Reagan. Then in 1992 and 1996 Ross Perot tried to mix it up with Clinton and Bush. Ultimately they all failed, and no true third-party ever lasted past their nominee.

So, that is where Hillary steps in… Ok, stop laughing. If Hillary split from the Democrat Party, and announced her run as an Independent, I would guarantee that she would easily win the coming election. If she selected a young, middle of the road conservative as the VP candidate, she would effective split the Republicans and Democrats, and ride to the White House on the 49.5% of the public who love her, and Bill.

Who would you vote for as a third party candidate? Would you support Hillary?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Print
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

VP Race – Who cares? 500EC says you do…

Has anyone really picked a President based on the VP candidate?  Or for that matter, even voted against a party due to the VP choice?  Maybe when Lyndon Johnson ran with John F Kennedy back in 1960.  SInce that time, the VP is really an after thought.  Heck, even Dan Qualye could not sink George the First’s run in 1988.

Who remembers Spiro Agnew?  Or maybe Edmund Muskie? Uh, Sargent Shriver, William Miller, Frank Knox?  Heck, most people probably don’t even know who Jack Kemp is.  Did Al Gore help Clinton win in 1992, I would vote no.  Did George H. W. Bush help Reagan, hmm, maybe…

So, leave me a comment with who you think the VP candidates will be.  The first person that posts a comment with BOTH Democratic and Republican choice will get 500EC.  I have the right to also award additional EC for particularly interesting choices; funny, inventive, etc.

My guess is:
Democrat – Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh
Republican – Florida Gov. Charlie Crist

Update 8/25/8
Biden is Obama’s choice, however we still do not know McCain’s pick.  Place your vote, the first person to pick Biden and the eventual winner will win the 500EC.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Print
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Why the European Union also needs to be Energy Independent

In the US, we have been talking about our current energy crisis, and our need to become energy independent.  The general population certainly is becoming aware of this need, $4 a gallon gas helps to get people focused on an issue.  Hopefully our political leaders will start to put action behind their rhetoric. However, the US is not the only country that needs to be concerned about energy independence.   With the recent crisis in Georgia, it is clear that this conflict has a large impact on the energy situation in Europe.

As we discussed last week, Russia currently has a stranglehold on the EU’s energy supply.  The Russians now supply about 25 percent of the European Union’s crude oil needs and half of its natural gas.  If the European Union has not figured out the strategic importance of this fact, the Russians obviously have.  Just as OPEC held the West hostage in the 70’s, Russia now has the ability to wield the same control over Europe.  Their first step was invading Georgia and daring NATO to do anything about it.  So far, Europe has once again shown their leadership in the fine art of appeasement.   And the US, which is busy fighting multiple battles, does not have the stomach to get involved. 

There are three basic reasons why the US, EU, and others such as China, India, and Japan need to become energy independent.

1) Stop sending Trillions of dollars to non-democratic countries that are usually unstable dictators, or hostile regimes.  This money transfer is unhealthy to the global economy.  It allows a small group of people in these petro-kingdoms to hold their own people hostage.  Is it any surprise that almost no country who’s main export is oil is a free democracy that values human rights?

2) Our reliance on carbon based energy sources is a contributor to global warming.  In addition, the extraction of oil from areas such as the Middle East, Nigeria, and South America creates huge environmental issues.  These countries do not have strong environmental regulations like we have in the West.

3) New energy technology will drive our economy over the coming decades.  Instead of sending petro-dollars overseas, that money should be invested in our economy, and on new technology that will help make the world a safer and cleaner place to live.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Print
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

The Fairness Doctrine – Infringement of Free Speech?

According to a recent poll done by Rassumessen, nearly 47% of Americans seem to support some version of the Fairness Doctrine.  I am shocked that almost half the country feels that it is fine for the government to regulate Free Speech.  My guess is that if folks actually understood what was being proposed, we would see that number drop dramatically. 

For those too young to remember, The Fairness Doctrine was a policy of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission that required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was honest, equitable, and balanced. The doctrine has since been withdrawn by the FCC, and certain aspects of the doctrine have been questioned by courts.

The new version would be specifically targeted at talk radio, and the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Mark Levine.  The Democrats are unhappy that talk radio is dominated by Conservative shows, without a balanced number of Liberal shows.  Radio stations argue that they cannot generate ad revenue with Liberal shows, that they just are not popular with their audience.  Apparently, however, they are conformable with the Liberal TV news media (ABC, NBC, and CBS).   They are only suggesting that radio should be regulated, for now.

Having the government regulate the content and views of radio stations seems like a step backwards in terms of free speech.  If a station had a guest on talking about the importance of good child nutrition and the dangers of child obesity, would they than have to also have a guest that advocated McDonald’s?  Who makes the decision on what is “honest, equitable, and balanced”?  Nancy Pelosi or George Bush? 

Do you think the Fairness Doctrine an infringement of Free Speech?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Print
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

The Russian Bear is Awake – Hold onto your Wallet

Moscow, with its recent attack on its former Georgian republic has caused concern across the world.  Russia is feeling strong, and is showing that it is no longer going to sit idly by as their former client states forge stronger relationships with the EU and the West.  This new found strength has been gained by becoming one of the world’s largest energy producers. The Russians now supply about 25 percent of the European Union’s crude oil needs and half of its natural gas.  But now Black Sea oil tankers that normally would be filling up with Baku crude, are anchored 15 miles offshore the Georgian port of Batumi, waiting for a cessation of hostilities.

Russia has demonstrated that its military is a force to reckon with, that it can defeat a Western-trained force, and that the West and NATO will not act to intervene.  Like during the Cold War, the West has limited ability to blunt Russia’s military agression.  Both sides know that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is never going to happen.

After the fall of Communism, both Washington and the EU invested heavily in Russian energy production.  The result has been a network of oil and natural gas pipelines, ports, and tankers that can feed a million barrels a day to the world market. Washington has helped to expand and link that network directly to Europe, where Russia is currently the dominant supplier.  The multi-billion-dollar Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline that runs across Georgia is run by an international consortium, including American oil-giants Chevron and Conoco-Phillips.

Now, US taxpayers are about to get a double whammy.  Two government agencies, the Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im) and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), have made large investments in the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, lending money to private companies involved in the construction of the pipeline. Ex-Im Bank gave $160 million in loans, and OPIC has provided $100 million in “political risk insurance”.  If the pipeline is damaged or destroyed, these companies will be forced to write off these loans, and US taxpayers will be left to pickup the pieces.  That is a potential quarter of a Billion dollar bill that may come due soon.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Print
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Mission Accomplished – Bush Beats Bikini Babes

Mission Accomplished!
Mission Accomplished!

Misty May-Treanor finally got what she wanted.  After repeatedly asking, the President of the United States gleefully slapped the small of her tattooed back.  Partner Kerri Walsh watches closely, while Laura Bush toured Beijing’s famous Forbidden City.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Print
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Please Make Sure You Inflate Your Tires This Weekend!

As presumed Presidential nominee Barrack Obama taught us this week, it is vitally important for everyone to inflate their tires this weekend, and on a regular basis as well.  In addition, if you can also schedule a tune-up, that would be swell.  As Obama pointed out, “There are things you can do individually, though, to save energy.  Making sure your tires are properly inflated – simple thing.  But we could save all the oil that they’re talking about getting off drilling – if everybody was just inflating their tires?  And getting regular tune-ups? You’d actually save just as much!”

Now I am not sure exactly what his definition is of “all the oil that they’re talking about getting off drilling”, but that sure sounds like a lot.   The Energy Information Administration estimates that we could extract approximately 10 billion barrels of oil from ANWR alone, about 600 million barrels a year.  This is equal to just less than 10% of our total oil use in the US on a yearly basis. 

The federal government estimates the nation’s outer continental shelf might hold 85.9 billion barrels of crude, including 10.13 billion barrels off California.    Let’s call that another 600 million barrels a year just to make our numbers easy, it could be 4 or 5 times that number.

Just from those two sources, we could decrease our reliance on foreign oil by 15-20%.  If making sure your tires are inflated is equal to that amount, between the Republican solution (drilling), and the Democrat solution (inflating tires), we could lower our dependence on foreign oil by 30%-40% in 5-10 years.  That is great progress!  Way to go political leaders!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Print
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Average Americans Display PHEV Spirit

Today is Good News Tuesday.  After weeks and weeks of political squabbling about our current energy crisis, regular Americans are showing why our country is great.  American ingenuity and work ethic will drive our nation toward alternative energy sources and the goal of US energy independence, regardless of how hard the politicians try to get in the way. 

The Spirit of DC is a Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle that is currently travelling all around America.  Called PHEV3A (PHEV All Around America), the goal of their country-wide tour is to show the nation that plug-in hybrids and electric vehicles are truly practical and are possible now, we do not need to wait for new technology to be developed.   The converted 2005 Toyota Prius has a battery pack that was added to the rear of the vehicle, allowing it to be charged from a regular electrical outlet.  This allows the Prius to run on all-electric power for a greater percentage of time, resulting in 100+ MPG. 

Imagine what a fleet of PHEV’s getting 100+MPG would do to our dependence on foreign oil.  Urge your elected officials to support tax credits for PHEV ownership, and ask them to help encourage our auto companies to quickly bring new PHEV’s to market.   Ask them to spend some of the existing $35 Billion in taxes that ExxonMobile paid last quarter on supporting alternative energy sources.  Toyota and Honda currently lead the field in electric hybrids, and if our auto industry truly does not want to become irrelevant, they need to quickly bring more hybrids and PHEVs into production immediately.

If you think you might be a potential sponsor you can contact PHEV3A’s Co-Chairs, Joseph Lado, at the virtual PHEV3A operations Center (Poc) by emailing joelado@yahoo.comand “on the Road” PHEV3A driver “EVJerry” Asher at EVisionA2Z@usa.net.  You can keep up to date on their progress at their blog.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Print
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Electrifying Hoedown Spurs Shocking Powers

This September a human-powered sustainable dance club, called Club Watt by its owners, opens its doors in Rotterdam, Netherlands.  Club Watt proposes to power the club through human power.  This ultra-green dance club is deadly serious about taking themselves off-grid.

They create their energy through a high-tech floor that captures the movements of the dancers above and produces electricity down below.  Heavy duty coils and magnets provide the means of turning the moving floor into power.  The electricity is than stored in heavy-duty batteries and used as needed to power the Clubs’s sound system, lights, etc.  However, even with the high-tech floor, human power will only provide ~30% of the Club’s required energy.  The shortfall will be made up with solar power and a wind turbine.

What the company’s press release does not explain is that the average human only generates about one kilowatt-hour (kWh) per day.  At that rate, tapping into human energy to generate power proves to not be very efficient.  In the US, one kWH costs about a Quarter.  Obviously human energy will not be the US’s long-term solution for energy independence.

Human Power turns out be a great marketing tool for trendy companies that want to appear to look green, but in economic terms, it really does not make any sense.

If you think that this is shocking, read this.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Print
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks